Search for: "Harris et al v. Illinois State Police et al"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 9:34 am
City of Chicago, et al. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm
” [Eric Hanushek et al, NBER via Cowen] “L.A. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
QuinnDocket: 11-681Issue(s): (1) Whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a private organization as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs; and (2) whether the lower court erred in holding that the claims of providers in the Home Based Support Services Program are not ripe for… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
The new case is Harris, et al., v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
Policing debt collection to assure compliance with limitations bars. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
See Brief for Amicus Curiae MacArthur Justice Center, et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
It would be unconscionable for Congress to grant the FDA police-like powers over how--and ultimately who--produces our food without first considering alternatives to that which is being pushed by those behind this legislation who have greatly exaggerated the food safety "crisis. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Navistar had asked the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to void those polices because they had been adopted by the EPA without the public process required by law, but instead following input only from the SCR engine makers. [read post]
